From 79f0b17473dda3039f9226091e3806d191384822 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Carol (Nichols || Goulding)" <carol.nichols@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 19:37:26 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Add some error handling exercises

---
 errors/errors1.rs | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 errors/errors1.rs

diff --git a/errors/errors1.rs b/errors/errors1.rs
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5f96184
--- /dev/null
+++ b/errors/errors1.rs
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+// This example panics because the second time it calls `pop`, the `vec`
+// is empty, so `pop` returns `None`, and `unwrap` panics if it's called
+// on `None`. Handle this in a more graceful way than calling `unwrap`!
+// Scroll down for hints :)
+
+fn main() {
+    let mut list = vec![3];
+
+    let last = list.pop().unwrap();
+    println!("The last item in the list is {:?}", last);
+
+    let second_to_last = list.pop().unwrap();
+    println!("The second-to-last item in the list is {:?}", second_to_last);
+}
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+// Try using a `match` statement where the arms are `Some(thing)` and `None`.
+// Or set a default value to print out if you get `None` by using the
+// function `unwrap_or`.
+// Or use an `if let` statement on the result of `pop()` to both destructure
+// a `Some` value and only print out something if we have a value!