Auto merge of #144 - yvan-sraka:patch-0, r=komaeda
Add errors to exercises that compile without user changes Hi ! I played a bit with rustlings, and I felt that some exercises were incorrect because they passed the tests without me needing to edit the files! This gave me the feeling that the exercise was skiped! Especially when I use `rustlings watch`, it is easy to miss an exercise because the compilation error that is displayed is the one of the next exercise ... It is easy to identify "broken" exercises with: ```bash % find exercises -name "*.rs" | xargs -n 1 rustlings run ... ✅ Successfully ran exercises/move_semantics/move_semantics4.rs ✅ Successfully tested exercises/test2.rs ``` My suggestion is to make sure that these files trigger a compilation error by adding a simple syntax error (e.g. with `???` in the code that must change) so that our Rustacean can then play with it!
This commit is contained in:
commit
e336d04c79
@ -16,7 +16,8 @@ fn main() {
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
fn fill_vec(vec: Vec<i32>) -> Vec<i32> {
|
// `fill_vec()` no longer take `vec: Vec<i32>` as argument
|
||||||
|
fn fill_vec() -> Vec<i32> {
|
||||||
let mut vec = vec;
|
let mut vec = vec;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
vec.push(22);
|
vec.push(22);
|
||||||
|
@ -17,6 +17,11 @@ mod tests {
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
#[test]
|
#[test]
|
||||||
fn returns_twice_of_positive_numbers() {
|
fn returns_twice_of_positive_numbers() {
|
||||||
assert_eq!(4, 4);
|
assert_eq!(times_two(4), ???);
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
#[test]
|
||||||
|
fn returns_twice_of_negative_numbers() {
|
||||||
|
// TODO write an assert for `times_two(-4)`
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user