d75759e829
Instead of having to explain why ```rs let mut x = 100; let y = &mut x; let mut z_owned = *y; let z = &mut z_owned; *y += 100; *z += 1000; ``` and ```rs let mut x = 100; let y = &mut x; let z = &mut *y; *y += 100; *z += 1000; ``` are different, you still get the point across about having only one mutable reference. As it stands, this exercise does too much (dereferencing and having only one mutable reference), and by doing so confuses people. Example of someone being confused by this: <https://discord.com/channels/273534239310479360/273541522815713281/872689531428692040> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| move_semantics1.rs | ||
| move_semantics2.rs | ||
| move_semantics3.rs | ||
| move_semantics4.rs | ||
| move_semantics5.rs | ||
| README.md | ||
Move Semantics
These exercises are adapted from pnkfelix's Rust Tutorial -- Thank you Felix!!!
Further information
For this section, the book links are especially important.